<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why TV Isn&#8217;t Dead And Won&#8217;t Die Anytime Soon	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://theculturepin.com/why-tv-isnt-dead-and-wont-die-anytime-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://theculturepin.com/why-tv-isnt-dead-and-wont-die-anytime-soon/</link>
	<description>Observations From the Cultural Frontier...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:34:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: KMS		</title>
		<link>https://theculturepin.com/why-tv-isnt-dead-and-wont-die-anytime-soon/#comment-365</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KMS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theculturepin.com/?p=470#comment-365</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ramble on :)  I&#039;ll take it over zombie-ing out to Conan anyday.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ramble on 🙂  I&#8217;ll take it over zombie-ing out to Conan anyday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: BonnyM		</title>
		<link>https://theculturepin.com/why-tv-isnt-dead-and-wont-die-anytime-soon/#comment-364</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BonnyM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 06:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theculturepin.com/?p=470#comment-364</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sorry. I&#039;m willing to admit that apologizing is a psychological habit of mine... and I believe I just did again. Yes, discussion about TV is rather lacking in diversity, and interest for that matter... everyone saw the show, so what about the discussion is going to peak the interest? You certainly learn nothing new in the process, but I suppose the act of conversing with &#039;like-minded&#039; people is enough for many.

In my opinion, popular culture isn&#039;t truly culture as there is no diversity, no defining elements that make a society unique. It&#039;s a means for Westernization more than anything, and a way in which those of status (in the typical use of the word status, not the sociological sense) can reinforce their dominant ideologies of what should be the goal of every person... wealth, power, and prestige (as Max Weber deducted back in the late 19th and early 20th centuries). Everyone feels pressure that has been created by this &#039;pop culture&#039; to be important in the world, while fitting into what is deemed popular. What I find intriguing is that here in North America and northern Europe (where pop culture is so prevalent), there is a major emphasis placed on personal attainment and status within the society, while areas of Asia, Africa and South America (where the North American phenomina of &#039;pop culture&#039; isn&#039;t so present) focus on group goals and the society as a whole, or connectedness if you will. I think that says a lot about the influence of something that shouldn&#039;t be considered culture. I feel it sort of strips us of our true culture... the different elements we bring from our heritage and history, and how we go about our daily lives. Now, since this so called pop culture is literally everywhere, from print media, to TV, on the internet, books, news papers, journals, music, film, and even food (McDonalds... Starbucks) it&#039;s kind of hard to escape it... blanketing our world with meaningless things that have been created to enforce a sort of uniform &#039;culture&#039;. I&#039;d like to turn on a TV and see something that enriches my knowledge of the world... especially since we live in a society that claims diversity.

I rambled again...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. I&#8217;m willing to admit that apologizing is a psychological habit of mine&#8230; and I believe I just did again. Yes, discussion about TV is rather lacking in diversity, and interest for that matter&#8230; everyone saw the show, so what about the discussion is going to peak the interest? You certainly learn nothing new in the process, but I suppose the act of conversing with &#8216;like-minded&#8217; people is enough for many.</p>
<p>In my opinion, popular culture isn&#8217;t truly culture as there is no diversity, no defining elements that make a society unique. It&#8217;s a means for Westernization more than anything, and a way in which those of status (in the typical use of the word status, not the sociological sense) can reinforce their dominant ideologies of what should be the goal of every person&#8230; wealth, power, and prestige (as Max Weber deducted back in the late 19th and early 20th centuries). Everyone feels pressure that has been created by this &#8216;pop culture&#8217; to be important in the world, while fitting into what is deemed popular. What I find intriguing is that here in North America and northern Europe (where pop culture is so prevalent), there is a major emphasis placed on personal attainment and status within the society, while areas of Asia, Africa and South America (where the North American phenomina of &#8216;pop culture&#8217; isn&#8217;t so present) focus on group goals and the society as a whole, or connectedness if you will. I think that says a lot about the influence of something that shouldn&#8217;t be considered culture. I feel it sort of strips us of our true culture&#8230; the different elements we bring from our heritage and history, and how we go about our daily lives. Now, since this so called pop culture is literally everywhere, from print media, to TV, on the internet, books, news papers, journals, music, film, and even food (McDonalds&#8230; Starbucks) it&#8217;s kind of hard to escape it&#8230; blanketing our world with meaningless things that have been created to enforce a sort of uniform &#8216;culture&#8217;. I&#8217;d like to turn on a TV and see something that enriches my knowledge of the world&#8230; especially since we live in a society that claims diversity.</p>
<p>I rambled again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: KMS		</title>
		<link>https://theculturepin.com/why-tv-isnt-dead-and-wont-die-anytime-soon/#comment-363</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KMS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theculturepin.com/?p=470#comment-363</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://theculturepin.com/why-tv-isnt-dead-and-wont-die-anytime-soon/#comment-362&quot;&gt;BonnyM&lt;/a&gt;.

Oh gosh, I would never need an apology for hearing your thoughts.  Isn&#039;t that the point?  A dialogue?  Before all this internet business got started, the ironically titled &quot;social media&quot; I bemoaned television&#039;s destruction of the art of conversation.  That is not to say, however, in the spirit of the article to which you are replying, that TV in itself does not engender much discussion - but one wonders about the homogeneity of that discussion when we are all referencing the same damn thing.

My interest is in the variety that culture should bring to our lives.  This thing we call Pop Culture is in fact quite the opposite - a popularity contest fraught with status anxiety (a term coined by and the title of an excellent book by Alain de Boton) that is much smaller than we would ever care to admit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://theculturepin.com/why-tv-isnt-dead-and-wont-die-anytime-soon/#comment-362">BonnyM</a>.</p>
<p>Oh gosh, I would never need an apology for hearing your thoughts.  Isn&#8217;t that the point?  A dialogue?  Before all this internet business got started, the ironically titled &#8220;social media&#8221; I bemoaned television&#8217;s destruction of the art of conversation.  That is not to say, however, in the spirit of the article to which you are replying, that TV in itself does not engender much discussion &#8211; but one wonders about the homogeneity of that discussion when we are all referencing the same damn thing.</p>
<p>My interest is in the variety that culture should bring to our lives.  This thing we call Pop Culture is in fact quite the opposite &#8211; a popularity contest fraught with status anxiety (a term coined by and the title of an excellent book by Alain de Boton) that is much smaller than we would ever care to admit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: BonnyM		</title>
		<link>https://theculturepin.com/why-tv-isnt-dead-and-wont-die-anytime-soon/#comment-362</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BonnyM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theculturepin.com/?p=470#comment-362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You’re right... even though the idea of organic culture (for the people by the people, rather than by this ‘system’) is a great idea and should be encouraged, it’s not feasible in today’s society. Television is often seen as an escape (to just occupy your mind without active thought for a while) from reality for viewers. They have to deal with multiple stresses in their everyday lives and need a break from that, and for many people sitting in front of the television for an hour or two with family members, friends, or alone, is a way to experience without the stress of the situations they’re viewing. Then of course, there is the compulsion to be able to participate in the conversation at work on Monday regarding what happened on Flashpoint on Friday night, or who’s dating who on whatever program is popular around the office. Watching the show three days after you heard about it at work deflates the experience a bit.
I also think it should be mentioned that even though the producers, directors or writers (or anyone else related to the production of said television program for that matter), assign a certain meaning to the text (the program), there is no guarantee that the audience will interpret it as such. Perhaps the cashew would send a different message than a peanut... (uh, due to the large peanut allergy plaguing North American children?), but is the audience going to pick up on that? Maybe some will, obviously, but most aren’t going to. There are multiple ways of reading/viewing a text, and the producers are only hoping that the majority of the audience will truly read it the way they intended. Now, unless you sit down with the intention of actually breaking down the interactions and dialogue, you’re probably going to read it the way it was meant to be read. And in that case (not intending to analyze it), television serves its purpose as a very mindless way to escape from whatever it is that the viewer wishes to forget about for an hour. 
Not to mention computers and the internet involve a slight learning curve, and even though I can and do operate at least one program on the computer that most people have never heard of (and they should be glad of it), I still find that it takes a couple of days to pick up on the workings of different sites... where’s the relaxation in that? And, on top of it all... there is the never failing message “this video is not available in your area”.
I don’t pay for cable either, and don’t intend to anytime soon... it’s a gateway to laziness. 

This was much longer than I meant it to be, I apologize. I do realize it would have been much easier, and perhaps more appropriate to have merely said that I agree with you. Again, this novella was not intentional, I&#039;m very sorry.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’re right&#8230; even though the idea of organic culture (for the people by the people, rather than by this ‘system’) is a great idea and should be encouraged, it’s not feasible in today’s society. Television is often seen as an escape (to just occupy your mind without active thought for a while) from reality for viewers. They have to deal with multiple stresses in their everyday lives and need a break from that, and for many people sitting in front of the television for an hour or two with family members, friends, or alone, is a way to experience without the stress of the situations they’re viewing. Then of course, there is the compulsion to be able to participate in the conversation at work on Monday regarding what happened on Flashpoint on Friday night, or who’s dating who on whatever program is popular around the office. Watching the show three days after you heard about it at work deflates the experience a bit.<br />
I also think it should be mentioned that even though the producers, directors or writers (or anyone else related to the production of said television program for that matter), assign a certain meaning to the text (the program), there is no guarantee that the audience will interpret it as such. Perhaps the cashew would send a different message than a peanut&#8230; (uh, due to the large peanut allergy plaguing North American children?), but is the audience going to pick up on that? Maybe some will, obviously, but most aren’t going to. There are multiple ways of reading/viewing a text, and the producers are only hoping that the majority of the audience will truly read it the way they intended. Now, unless you sit down with the intention of actually breaking down the interactions and dialogue, you’re probably going to read it the way it was meant to be read. And in that case (not intending to analyze it), television serves its purpose as a very mindless way to escape from whatever it is that the viewer wishes to forget about for an hour.<br />
Not to mention computers and the internet involve a slight learning curve, and even though I can and do operate at least one program on the computer that most people have never heard of (and they should be glad of it), I still find that it takes a couple of days to pick up on the workings of different sites&#8230; where’s the relaxation in that? And, on top of it all&#8230; there is the never failing message “this video is not available in your area”.<br />
I don’t pay for cable either, and don’t intend to anytime soon&#8230; it’s a gateway to laziness. </p>
<p>This was much longer than I meant it to be, I apologize. I do realize it would have been much easier, and perhaps more appropriate to have merely said that I agree with you. Again, this novella was not intentional, I&#8217;m very sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jill		</title>
		<link>https://theculturepin.com/why-tv-isnt-dead-and-wont-die-anytime-soon/#comment-361</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 09:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theculturepin.com/?p=470#comment-361</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I consider myself a heavy consumer of Internet video (both streaming and downloading), but I still find myself relying  on traditional TV.   I am one of the consumers that you mentioned - I enjoy traditional TV passively, and sometimes I just want to watch something random yet reliable that doesn&#039;t require too much effort on my part.  Online video is frustrating at times; there can be connection issues, service issues, source issues, and just the fact that I have to sift through a lot of irrelevant stuff to find a video.  Also, even in the era of prolific DVR usage there are many television shows that still cannot be found online (and might never be), so I have to &quot;tune in&quot; if I want to watch something in particular that interests me.  Although I do prefer to watch video online at times, I still like my TV watching experience.  Maybe this is a result of growing up with TV as opposed to being a digital native?  Maybe future generations will boycott traditional TV entirely, but not quite yet.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I consider myself a heavy consumer of Internet video (both streaming and downloading), but I still find myself relying  on traditional TV.   I am one of the consumers that you mentioned &#8211; I enjoy traditional TV passively, and sometimes I just want to watch something random yet reliable that doesn&#8217;t require too much effort on my part.  Online video is frustrating at times; there can be connection issues, service issues, source issues, and just the fact that I have to sift through a lot of irrelevant stuff to find a video.  Also, even in the era of prolific DVR usage there are many television shows that still cannot be found online (and might never be), so I have to &#8220;tune in&#8221; if I want to watch something in particular that interests me.  Although I do prefer to watch video online at times, I still like my TV watching experience.  Maybe this is a result of growing up with TV as opposed to being a digital native?  Maybe future generations will boycott traditional TV entirely, but not quite yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
